Occurrence of vesicoureteral reflux in children

Aim:  The reported low occurrence of vesicoureteral reflux in the general population seems implausible. We wanted to test the hypothesis that reflux is more common and more independent of urinary‐tract infection than has previously been thought. Methods:  We tested our hypothesis by analysing the ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa Paediatrica Vol. 99; no. 12; pp. 1875 - 1878
Main Authors Venhola, M, Hannula, A, Huttunen, N-P, Renko, M, Pokka, T, Uhari, M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2010
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim:  The reported low occurrence of vesicoureteral reflux in the general population seems implausible. We wanted to test the hypothesis that reflux is more common and more independent of urinary‐tract infection than has previously been thought. Methods:  We tested our hypothesis by analysing the characteristics of 406 consecutive children aged <5 years who had been referred for consultation because of urinary‐tract infection. Using data on their urine samples, we evaluated the reliability of the urinary‐tract infection diagnosis and analysed the frequencies of vesicoureteral reflux and abnormal ultrasound findings in three reliability groups (A: certain urinary‐tract infection, B: possible and C: improbable). Results:  The occurrence of reflux was the same irrespective of the diagnostic reliability of urinary‐tract infection (A: 98/276 [36%] versus B: 13/46 [28%] versus C: 9/25 [36%]). Most of the abnormal ultrasound findings (58/71, 80%) were found among patients with a certain diagnosis (Group A). Conclusion:  We suggest that vesicoureteral reflux is more common in children even without urinary‐tract infection than has been thought previously. The guidelines recommending a search for reflux by means of voiding cystourethrography should be reconsidered.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-7GC4KMRJ-6
ArticleID:APA1909
istex:0A679A99C10E07ECE73C62805ADAAE084682B078
ISSN:0803-5253
1651-2227
DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01909.x