A Test of Alternative Measures of Disconfirmation

ABSTRACT Disconfirmation has been widely used in a number of research traditions, however there are many different operationalizations of this construct. Little research has investigated the relative effectiveness of these various methods. The research reported here examines five operationalizations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDecision sciences Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 31 - 62
Main Authors Spreng, Richard A., Page Jr, Thomas J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA , and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , UK Blackwell Publishing 01.12.2003
American Institute for Decision Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Disconfirmation has been widely used in a number of research traditions, however there are many different operationalizations of this construct. Little research has investigated the relative effectiveness of these various methods. The research reported here examines five operationalizations of disconfirmation and their effect on satisfaction. These tests are carried out using two different comparison standards in two different settings. The results indicate some methods are better in certain situations and are inappropriate in others. Implications for both practical and theoretical research are discussed.
Bibliography:ArticleID:DECI2214
ark:/67375/WNG-RM2DSS3P-L
The authors would like to thank Cornelia Dröge and Roger Calantone for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
istex:87AC29CFA01D8814D64B060A51B16A8F05734051
ISSN:0011-7315
1540-5915
DOI:10.1111/1540-5915.02214