Optogenetic activation of mesencephalic projections to the nucleus accumbens shell impairs probabilistic reversal learning by disrupting learning from negative reinforcement
Cognitive flexibility, the capacity to adapt behaviour to changes in the environment, is impaired in a range of brain disorders, including schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease. Putative neural substrates of cognitive flexibility include mesencephalic pathways to the ventral striatum (VS) and d...
Saved in:
Published in | The European journal of neuroscience Vol. 60; no. 11; pp. 6765 - 6778 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
France
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.12.2024
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Cognitive flexibility, the capacity to adapt behaviour to changes in the environment, is impaired in a range of brain disorders, including schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease. Putative neural substrates of cognitive flexibility include mesencephalic pathways to the ventral striatum (VS) and dorsomedial striatum (DMS), hypothesized to encode learning signals needed to maximize rewarded outcomes during decision‐making. However, it is unclear whether mesencephalic projections to the ventral and dorsal striatum are distinct in their contribution to flexible reward‐related learning. Here, rats acquired a two‐choice spatial probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task, reinforced on an 80%|20% basis (correct|incorrect responses) that assessed the flexibility of behaviour to repeated reversals of response‐outcome contingencies. We report that optogenetic stimulation of projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcS) in the VS significantly impaired reversal learning when optical stimulation was temporally aligned with negative feedback (i.e., reward omission). VTA → NAcS stimulation during other phases of the behavioural task was without significant effect. Optogenetic stimulation of projection neurons from the substantia nigra (SN) to the DMS, aligned either with reward receipt or omission or prior to making a choice, had no significant effect on reversal learning. These findings are consistent with the notion that increased activity in the VTA → NAcS pathway disrupts behavioural flexibility by impairing learning from negative reinforcement. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information Katharina Zühlsdorff and Júlia Sala‐Bayo, Joint first authors. This research was funded by an award from Boehringer Ingelheim to JWD and by a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator grant 104631/Z/14/Z to TWR. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. All experiments were conducted at Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany. This work was also supported by the La Caixa Foundation, Spain, and a studentship from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Germany. KZ was funded by the Angharad Dodds John Bursary, Downing College, Cambridge. SP was funded by a student internship from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Germany. SD, WN, MvH and JRN are full‐time employees at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Germany. JWD has received funding from GlaxoSmithKline and editorial honoraria from the British Neuroscience Association and Springer Verlag. TWR is a consultant for Cambridge Cognition; had recent research grants with Shionogi and GlaxoSmithKline and receives editorial honoraria from Springer Nature and Elsevier. Edited by: Serge Schiffmann Johan Alsiö and Jeffrey W. Dalley, Joint last authors. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Funding information This research was funded by an award from Boehringer Ingelheim to JWD and by a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator grant 104631/Z/14/Z to TWR. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. All experiments were conducted at Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany. This work was also supported by the La Caixa Foundation, Spain, and a studentship from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Germany. KZ was funded by the Angharad Dodds John Bursary, Downing College, Cambridge. SP was funded by a student internship from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Germany. SD, WN, MvH and JRN are full‐time employees at Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Germany. JWD has received funding from GlaxoSmithKline and editorial honoraria from the British Neuroscience Association and Springer Verlag. TWR is a consultant for Cambridge Cognition; had recent research grants with Shionogi and GlaxoSmithKline and receives editorial honoraria from Springer Nature and Elsevier. |
ISSN: | 0953-816X 1460-9568 1460-9568 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ejn.16584 |