Videoscopic Left Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation for Patients With Recurrent Ventricular Fibrillation/Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia Syndromes Besides Congenital Long-QT Syndrome

BACKGROUND—Treatment options for patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias refractory to pharmacotherapy and ablation are minimal. Although left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) is well established in long-QT syndrome, its role in non–long-QT syndrome arrhythmogenic channelopathies and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 782 - 788
Main Authors Coleman, Mira A, Bos, J Martijn, Johnson, Jonathan N, Owen, Heidi J, Deschamps, Claude, Moir, Christopher, Ackerman, Michael J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD American Heart Association, Inc 01.08.2012
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND—Treatment options for patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias refractory to pharmacotherapy and ablation are minimal. Although left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) is well established in long-QT syndrome, its role in non–long-QT syndrome arrhythmogenic channelopathies and cardiomyopathies is less clear. Here, we report our single-center experience in performing LCSD in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS—In this institutional review board–approved study, we retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients (N=91) who had videoscopic LCSD at our institution from 2005 to 2011. Data were analyzed for the subset (n=27) who were denervated for an underlying diagnosis other than autosomal dominant or sporadic long-QT syndrome. The spectrum of arrhythmogenic disease included catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (n=13), Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (n=5), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (n=4), left ventricular noncompaction (n=2), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=1), ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=1), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (n=1). Five patients had LCSD because of high-risk assessment and β-blocker intolerance, none of whom had a sentinel breakthrough cardiac event at early follow-up. Among the remaining 22 previously symptomatic patients who had LCSD as secondary prevention, all had an attenuation in cardiac events, with 18 having no breakthrough cardiac events so far and 4 having experienced ≥1 post-LCSD breakthrough cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS—LCSD may represent a substrate-independent antifibrillatory treatment option for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia syndromes other than long-QT syndrome. The early follow-up seems promising, with a marked reduction in the frequency of cardiac events postdenervation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1941-3149
1941-3084
DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.112.971754