Exact Multiple Comparisons of Three or More Regression Lines: Pairwise Comparisons and Comparisons with a Control

The problem of finding exact simultaneous confidence bounds for differences in regression models for k groups via the union‐intersection method is considered. The error terms are taken to be iid normal random variables. Under an assumption slightly more general than having identical design matrices...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiometrical journal Vol. 44; no. 7; pp. 801 - 812
Main Author Spurrier, John D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin WILEY-VCH Verlag 01.10.2002
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley-VCH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The problem of finding exact simultaneous confidence bounds for differences in regression models for k groups via the union‐intersection method is considered. The error terms are taken to be iid normal random variables. Under an assumption slightly more general than having identical design matrices for each of the k groups, it is shown that an existing probability point for the multivariate studentized range can be used to find the necessary probability point for pairwise comparisons of regression models. The resulting methods can be used with simple or multiple regression. Under a weaker assumption on the k design matrices that allows more observations to be taken from the control group than from the k‐1 treatment groups, a method is developed for computing exact probability points for comparing the simple linear regression models of the k‐1 groups to that of the control. Within a class of designs, the optimal design for comparisons with a control takes the square root of (k‐1) times as many observations from the control than from each treatment group. The simultaneous confidence bounds for all pairwise differences and for comparisons with a control are much narrower than Spurrier's intervals for all contrasts of k regression lines.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-LSVDGHT4-Z
ArticleID:BIMJ801
istex:58875351A7922748C965D8D10ACCCF93D46F1D08
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0323-3847
1521-4036
DOI:10.1002/1521-4036(200210)44:7<801::AID-BIMJ801>3.0.CO;2-M