Studies of EEG Asymmetry and Depression: To Normalise or Not?

A brief review of 50 studies from the last 10 years indicated that it is often accepted practice to apply log transformation processes to raw EEG data. This practice is based upon the assumptions that (a) EEG data do not resemble a normal distribution, (b) applying a transformation will produce an a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSymmetry (Basel) Vol. 15; no. 9; p. 1689
Main Authors Sharpley, Christopher F., Arnold, Wayne M., Evans, Ian D., Bitsika, Vicki, Jesulola, Emmanuel, Agnew, Linda L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2023
Subjects
alpha asymmetry
Asymmetry
Brain research
correlations
EEG
Kurtosis
logarithmic
Mental disorders
Normal distribution
normalisation
Normality
Skewness
Statistical analysis
Transformations
Australia
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:A brief review of 50 studies from the last 10 years indicated that it is often accepted practice to apply log transformation processes to raw EEG data. This practice is based upon the assumptions that (a) EEG data do not resemble a normal distribution, (b) applying a transformation will produce an acceptably normal distribution, (c) the logarithmic transformation is the most valid form of transformation for these data, and (d) the statistical procedures intended to be used are not robust to non-normality. To test those assumptions, EEG data from 100 community participants were analysed for their normality by reference to their skewness and kurtosis, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk statistics, and shapes of histograms. Where non-normality was observed, several transformations were applied, and the data again tested for normality to identify the most appropriate method. To test the effects of normalisation from all these processes, Pearson and Spearman correlations between the raw and normalised EEG alpha asymmetry data and depression were calculated to detect any variation in the significance of the resultant statistic.
ISSN:2073-8994
2073-8994
DOI:10.3390/sym15091689