Adverse effects of metallic artifacts on voxel-wise analysis and tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging

• Published in: Acta radiologica (1987) Vol. 58; no. 2; p. 211
• Main Authors: Goto, Masami, Abe, Osamu, Hata, Junichi, Fukunaga, Issei, Shimoji, Keigo, Kunimatsu, Akira, Gomi, Tsutomu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.02.2017
• Subjects: Adult; Anisotropy; Brain - anatomy & histology; Brain - diagnostic imaging; Dental Implants; Diffusion Tensor Imaging - methods; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Metals; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Young Adult; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); metallic artifact; tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS); Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); voxel-wise analysis
• ISSN: 1600-0455
• DOI: 10.1177/0284185116641348

Background Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that reflects the Brownian motion of water molecules constrained within brain tissue. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is one of the most commonly measured DTI parameters, and can be applied to quantitative analysis of white matter as tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and voxel-wise analysis. Purpose To show an association between metallic implants and the results of statistical analysis (voxel-wise group comparison and TBSS) for fractional anisotropy (FA) mapping, in DTI of healthy adults. Material and Methods Sixteen healthy volunteers were scanned with 3-Tesla MRI. A magnetic keeper type of dental implant was used as the metallic implant. DTI was acquired three times in each participant: (i) without a magnetic keeper (FAnon1); (ii) with a magnetic keeper (FAimp); and (iii) without a magnetic keeper (FAnon2) as reproducibility of FAnon1. Group comparisons with paired t-test were performed as FAnon1 vs. FAnon2, and as FAnon1 vs. FAimp. Results Regions of significantly reduced and increased local FA values were revealed by voxel-wise group comparison analysis (a P value of less than 0.05, corrected with family-wise error), but not by TBSS. Conclusion Metallic implants existing outside the field of view produce artifacts that affect the statistical analysis (voxel-wise group comparisons) for FA mapping. When statistical analysis for FA mapping is conducted by researchers, it is important to pay attention to any dental implants present in the mouths of the participants.