The significant interaction between age and diabetes mellitus for colorectal cancer: Evidence from NHANES data 1999–2016

•SAS version 9.4's Procedure Survey methodology was applied.•NHANES data analysis found subjects with DM at age ≥65 do not increase risk for CRC.•Analysis confirmed subjects with DM at ages 18–65 years have a higher risk for CRC. Diabetes mellitus has been associated with elevated risk of color...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPrimary care diabetes Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 518 - 521
Main Authors Yang, Feng, Liang, Hong, Rosenthal, Raul J., Wexner, Steven D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•SAS version 9.4's Procedure Survey methodology was applied.•NHANES data analysis found subjects with DM at age ≥65 do not increase risk for CRC.•Analysis confirmed subjects with DM at ages 18–65 years have a higher risk for CRC. Diabetes mellitus has been associated with elevated risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), although interaction between age and DM is unclear. We examined the relationship among DM, CRC and age. 22,580 subjects aged ≥18 years were identified from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database collected between 1999–2016. To account for the complex, stratified, multistage probability sampling design in NHANES, SASv9.4 Procedure Survey Methodology was applied. Univariate analysis compared individual baseline characteristics between subjects with and without DM. Multivariate logistic regression model assessed association between DM and CRC, in which the model included factors with p<0.05 in univariate analysis as covariates. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in age (p<0.0001), race (p<0.0001), smoking (p=0.0023) and body mass index (p<0.0001) between No-DM and DM. Multivariate analysis revealed significant interaction between age and DM (p=0.0004). Subjects with DM aged 18–65 were more likely to experience CRC (OR=4.47, 95%CI=(1.33–15.07); p=0.0157) compared to those without DM. Subjects with DM aged >65 were not at increased risk for CRC (OR=0.83, 95%CI=(0.43–1.59); p=0.5665) compared to those without DM. Age, DM, and interaction between age and DM are risk factors for CRC. Individuals with DM aged 18–65 years have a higher CRC risk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1751-9918
1878-0210
1878-0210
DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2021.02.006