Duped: Examining Gender Stereotypes in Disengagement and Deradicalization Practices

• Published in: Studies in conflict and terrorism Vol. 45; no. 11; pp. 953 - 976
• Main Author: Schmidt, Rachel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington Routledge 02.11.2022; Taylor & Francis LLC
• Subjects: Counterterrorism; Deviance; Disengagement; Extremism; Gender stereotypes; Insurgency; ISIS (Organization); Law enforcement; Media violence; Narratives; Policy making; Political violence; Radicalism; Radicalization; Terrorism; Terrorism (International law); Victims; Women; Women terrorists; UNITED KINGDOM; SYRIA
• ISSN: 1057-610X; 1521-0731
• DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1711586

In narratives around insurgencies, terrorism, and other forms of political violence, the media-and policymakers-frequently portray women as victims or unintelligent pawns of men. But these violent women get more media attention than their male counterparts because they are a shocking departure from gendered expectations of nurturing, peaceful women. However, even such narratives of deviance can reinforce societal stereotypes about women by emphasizing that they are emotional but not political, easily manipulated, often deranged, or simply unintelligent. Using in-depth interviews in Ireland and the United Kingdom with practitioners in counter terrorism (CT) and countering violent extremism (CVE), this paper argues that a failure to ask meaningful questions about women's roles in extremist violence has reinforced gender stereotypes, leading to disengagement and deradicalization practices that ignore or downplay women's importance in fostering violence.