A Comparison between One- and Two-Loop ATCS Architectures Proposed for CEV
In an effort to help future crewed spacecraft thermal control analysts understand the characteristics of one-and two-loop Active Thermal Control Systems (ATCS), a comparison was made between the one- and two-loop ATCS architectures officially proposed for the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) in Design...
Saved in:
Published in | SAE International journal of aerospace Vol. 4; no. 1; pp. 344 - 350 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Warrendale
SAE International
01.01.2011
SAE International, a Pennsylvania Not-for Profit |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In an effort to help future crewed spacecraft thermal control analysts understand the characteristics of one-and two-loop Active Thermal Control Systems (ATCS), a comparison was made between the one- and two-loop ATCS architectures officially proposed for the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) in Design Analysis Cycle 1 (DAC1) and DAC2, respectively. This report provides a description of each design, along with mass and power estimates derived from their respective Master Equipment List (MEL) and Power Equipment List (PEL). Since some of the components were sized independent of loop architecture (ex. coldplates and heat exchangers), the mass and power for these components were based on the MEL and PEL of the most mature design (i.e. two-loop architecture). The mass and power of the two architectures are then compared and the ability of each design to meet CEV requirements is discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 2009-07-12 ICES 169705 Savannah, Georgia, United States |
ISSN: | 1946-3855 1946-3901 1946-3901 |
DOI: | 10.4271/2009-01-2458 |