Association of endoscopic biopsy sampling methods with detection of precursor lesions of gastric cancer

The yield of various endoscopic biopsy sampling methods for detection of precursor lesions of noncardia gastric cancer in a real-world setting remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the association of endoscopic biopsy sampling methods with detection of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastrointestinal endoscopy Vol. 99; no. 2; pp. 204 - 213.e5
Main Authors Moon, Rebecca H., Puttock, Eric J., Chen, Wansu, Luong, Tiffany Q., Wu, Bechien U.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The yield of various endoscopic biopsy sampling methods for detection of precursor lesions of noncardia gastric cancer in a real-world setting remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the association of endoscopic biopsy sampling methods with detection of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and gastric dysplasia (GD). We conducted a case-control study of adult patients who underwent EGD with biopsy sampling between 2010 and 2021 in a racially and ethnically diverse U.S. healthcare system. Cases were patients with histopathologic findings of GIM and/or GD. Control subjects were matched 1:1 by age, procedure date, and medical center. We compared the detection of GIM and GD using 4 different biopsy sampling methods: unspecified, specified stomach location, 2+2, and the Sydney protocol. Additionally, we assessed trends in use of sampling methods (Cochrane-Armitage) and identified patient and endoscopist factors associated with their use (logistic regression). We identified 20,938 GIM and 455 GD matched pairs. A greater proportion of GIM cases were detected using 2+2 (31.3% vs 25.3%, P < .0001) and the Sydney protocol (9.1% vs 1.0%, P < .0001) compared with control subjects. Similarly, a greater proportion of GD cases were detected using the Sydney protocol (15.6% vs .4%, P < .0001). We observed an increasing trend in the use of the Sydney protocol during the study period (3.8%-16.1% in cases, P < .0001; 1%-1.1% in control subjects, P = .005). Male and Asian American patients were more likely to undergo 2+2 or the Sydney protocol, whereas female and Hispanic endoscopists were more likely to perform sampling using these protocols. The application of the Sydney protocol is associated with an increased detection of precursor lesions of gastric cancer in routine clinical practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.003