Automated gonioscopy photography for iridocorneal angle grading

• Published in: European journal of ophthalmology Vol. 30; no. 1; p. 112
• Main Authors: Teixeira, Filipa, Sousa, David C, Leal, Inês, Barata, André, Neves, Carlos M, Pinto, Luís A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.01.2020
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anterior Chamber - diagnostic imaging; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Glaucoma - diagnosis; Gonioscopy - methods; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Photography - methods; ROC Curve; Young Adult; gonioscopy; Anterior chamber angle; automated grading; iridocorneal angle
• ISSN: 1724-6016
• DOI: 10.1177/1120672118806436

The aim of this study is to assess the agreement between manual and automated gonioscopy for iridocorneal angle opening. The research is a cross-sectional observational study. Manual and automated gonioscopy were performed to consecutive patients in a glaucoma clinic. Iridocorneal angle opening grading was performed according to Shaffer's classification. Automated gonioscopy was performed with NGS-1 automated gonioscope (NIDEK Co., Gamagori, Japan). The automated gonio-photos were graded by two independent observers. Agreement between automated and manual gonioscopy and also among raters was ascertained by Fleiss' kappa statistic and comparison of area under curve. In total, 88 eyes of 47 subjects were analysed. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years. Twenty eyes (22.7%) were excluded from grading due to poor quality images. Angle closure was detected in 23.4% with dynamic gonioscopy in comparison with 4.3% using automated image grading. The agreement for angle closure diagnosis between dynamic and automated gonioscopy was low (κ = 0.09 ± 0.10; p = 0.18). The area under curve for detecting eyes with angle closure showed poor accuracy between automated and manual methods (area under curve: 0.53 ± 0.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.44-0.62). There was modest inter-rater agreement for angle opening assessment of automated images with Fleiss' kappa of 0.17 (95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.238). Manual and automated gonioscopy showed only slight agreement for the assessment of iridocorneal angle opening status. Further improvements of the NGS-1 automated gonioscopy and technique are desired for widespread use in a real-life setting.