A milestone study: Structured variability as the key to unraveling (contact-induced) language change

Despite increasing attention to bilingualism – conferences, publications, grants – linguists are as far as ever from reaching consensus. Is code-switching the alternation between two equally activated languages or is it the insertion of elements from a source language into a recipient language? Can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBilingualism (Cambridge, England) Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 233 - 236
Main Author CACOULLOS, RENA TORRES
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.04.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite increasing attention to bilingualism – conferences, publications, grants – linguists are as far as ever from reaching consensus. Is code-switching the alternation between two equally activated languages or is it the insertion of elements from a source language into a recipient language? Can and should we distinguish borrowing and code-switching of single words? Is there grammatical convergence between bilinguals’ two languages and does code-switching promote it? Since the first accounts of the structure of code-switching in the 1970s, the same questions have been readdressed with astoundingly little, if any, cumulative advances. Scientific progress has been obstructed by polemic debate, often fueled by elicited judgments, which may display random error (Labov, 1996), or reports of the behavior of stray individuals, which are uninterpretable in the absence of knowledge of the systematic community pattern (Labov, 2006/1966, p. 5).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1366-7289
1469-1841
DOI:10.1017/S1366728911000241