Sustainable strategic planning for a national natural gas energy system accounting for unconventional sources

• Published in: Energy conversion and management Vol. 181; pp. 382 - 397
• Main Authors: Villicaña-García, Esbeydi, Ponce-Ortega, José María
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2019; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Accounting; Associated natural gas; Carbon dioxide; Carbon dioxide emissions; Case studies; CO2 emissions; Costs; Economic conditions; Economic factors; Economic models; Environmental impact; Fresh water; Freshwater environments; Gas recovery; Hazardous materials; Importation; Imports; Multiple objective analysis; Natural gas; Occupational health; Optimization; Shale; Shale gas; Strategic planning; Transportation; Unconventional sources; Water consumption; Strategic planning; Occupational health; CO2 emissions; Natural gas; Unconventional sources; Fresh water
• ISSN: 0196-8904; 1879-2227
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.023

•A strategic planning for satisfying national natural gas demands is presented.•Conventional and unconventional resources have been incorporated.•Economic, environmental and health issues haven been optimized.•A case study from Mexico has been presented.•Results show that is possible to obtain trade-off solutions. This work presents an optimization model for the strategic planning to satisfy the national demands of natural gas considering unconventional extraction such as shale gas and offshore extraction and conventional ways to produce associated and non-associated natural gas using enhanced gas recovery systems, as well as importation. The model incorporates a multi-objective optimization strategy to obtain trade-offs between economic, environmental and health issues. A case study from Mexico is presented to show the applicability of the proposed approach to satisfy the increasing national demand of natural gas through different extraction ways. Furthermore, in the presented study, economic, environmental and health factors were evaluated to select the best option. The economic factors consider costs associated with the production and treatment of natural gas, the used fresh water and the costs that involve the transportation of natural gas from its point of extraction to final markets. Regarding to the environmental impact, the fresh water consumption and CO2 emissions are considered. The occupational health of the involved processes in the production of natural gas is also evaluated, this because workers are continuously exposed to hazardous substances that can cause long-term damage. Results show that it is possible to decrease imports to satisfy the national demands for natural gas only with their own resources, and taking care for the economic, environmental and health issues. By maximizing PROFIT, 65.9% is satisfied through the production of shale gas and the rest is satisfied by the other extraction processes without using importation; this scenario represents a PROFIT of 1.58 × 1010 $/y, 22.774 total MMmetric ton CO2e/y and 36.576 MMm3/y for consumed fresh water.