Interprofessional Survey of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Early Mobilization of Critically Ill Patients in Montreal, Canada

• Published in: Journal of intensive care medicine Vol. 34; no. 3; p. 218
• Main Authors: Anekwe, David E, Koo, Karen Kin-Yue, de Marchie, Michel, Goldberg, Peter, Jayaraman, Dev, Spahija, Jadranka
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.03.2019
• Subjects: Attitude of Health Personnel; Clinical Competence; Critical Illness - therapy; Cross-Sectional Studies; Early Ambulation; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Nurses; Physical Therapists; Physicians; Practice Patterns, Physicians; Quebec; Respiratory Therapy; Surveys and Questionnaires; Quebec; barriers; critical illness; clinical practice patterns; early ambulation; physical therapy specialty; intensive care units
• ISSN: 1525-1489
• DOI: 10.1177/0885066617696846

Early mobilization is safe, feasible, and associated with better outcomes in patients with critical illness. However, barriers to mobilization in clinical practice still exist. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and practice patterns of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians, as well as the barriers and facilitators to early mobilization. Cross-sectional survey. Intensive care units of 3 university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Canada. One hundred and thirty-eight ICU clinicians, including nurses, physicians, respiratory therapists, and physiotherapists. None. Perceived barriers, facilitators, knowledge, and practice patterns of early mobilization were assessed using a previously validated mobility survey tool. The overall response rate was 50.0% (138 of 274). Early mobilization was not perceived as a top priority in 49% of respondents. Results showed that clinicians were not fully aware of the benefits of early mobilization as per the current literature. About 58% of clinicians did not feel well trained and informed to mobilize mechanically ventilated patients. Perceptions on patient-level barriers varied with clinicians' professional training, but there was a high degree of interprofessional and intraprofessional disagreement on the permissible maximal level activity in different scenarios of critically ill patients. Our survey shows limited awareness, among our respondents, of the clinical benefits of early mobilization and high level of disagreement on the permissible maximal level of activity in the critically ill patients. Future studies should evaluate the role of knowledge translation in modifying these barriers and improving early mobilization.