Beijing Friendship Hospital Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Elderly Male (BFH-OSTM) vs Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: a cross-sectional study

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: An, Ning, Lin, Ji Sheng, Fei, Qi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 28.06.2021; BMC
• Subjects: Beijing Friendship Hospital Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Elderly Male; Bone density; Bone diseases; Bone mineral density; Bone surgery; Compression; Cross-sectional studies; Energy; Estrogens; Fracture risk assessment tool; Fractures; Hospitals; Magnetic resonance imaging; Male; Metabolism; Mortality; Musculoskeletal diseases; Older people; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians; Pain; Population; Questionnaires; Risk assessment; Risk factors; Self evaluation; Self-assessment; Surgery; Trauma; Vertebrae; Beijing China; China
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04476-2

Background To compare the validation of four tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (PNOVCFs) in older Chinese men: bone mineral density (BMD), Asian osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OSTA), World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) (without BMD) and Beijing Friendship Hospital Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (BFH-OSTM). Methods A cross sectional study was conducted from 2013 to 2019. A total of 846 men aged ≥50 were included and were divided into two groups: Fracture Group (patients with PNOVCFs underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty surgery) and Non-Fracture Group (community dwelled subjects for healthy examination). All subjects accepted a dual-energy X-ray BMD test and a structured questionnaire. The results of BMD, OSTA, FRAX and BFH-OSTM scores were assessed and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare the validity of four tools for identifying PNOVCFs. Optimal cutoff points, sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were determined. Results There were significant differences including BMD T score (femoral neck, total hip and L1-L4), OSTA, FRAX and BFH-OSTM scores between Fracture group and Non-fracture group. Compared to BMD and OSTA, BFH-OSTM and FRAX had better predictive value, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC value are 0.841, 81.29%, 70.67% and 0.796, 74.85%, 78.52%, respectively. Compared with FRAX, the BFH-OSTM has a better AUC value. Conclusions Both BFH-OSTM and FRAX can be used to identify POVCFs, However, BFH-OSTM model may be a more simple and effective tool to identify the risk of POVCFs in Chinese elderly men.