The Microeconomic Impacts of Employee Representatives: Evidence from Membership Thresholds

Employee representatives in firms are a potentially key but not yet studied source of the impact of unions and works councils. Their actions can shape multiple drivers of firm performance, including collective bargaining, strikes, and training. This article examines the impact of union representativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndustrial relations (Berkeley) Vol. 58; no. 4; pp. 591 - 622
Main Author Silva Martins, Pedro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berkeley Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Employee representatives in firms are a potentially key but not yet studied source of the impact of unions and works councils. Their actions can shape multiple drivers of firm performance, including collective bargaining, strikes, and training. This article examines the impact of union representative mandates by exploiting legal membership thresholds present in many countries. In the case of Portugal, which we examine here, while firms employing up to forty‐nine union members are required to have one union representative; this increases to two (three) union reps for firms with fifty to ninety‐nine (100–199) union members. Drawing on matched employer–employee data on the unionized sector and regression discontinuity methods, we find that a one percentage point increase in the legal union representative/members ratio leads to an increase in firm performance of at least 7 percent. This result generally holds across multiple dimensions of firm performance and appears to be driven by increased training. However, we find no effects of union representatives on firm‐level wages, given the predominance of sectoral collective bargaining.
ISSN:0019-8676
1468-232X
DOI:10.1111/irel.12248