The Microeconomic Impacts of Employee Representatives: Evidence from Membership Thresholds
Employee representatives in firms are a potentially key but not yet studied source of the impact of unions and works councils. Their actions can shape multiple drivers of firm performance, including collective bargaining, strikes, and training. This article examines the impact of union representativ...
Saved in:
Published in | Industrial relations (Berkeley) Vol. 58; no. 4; pp. 591 - 622 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berkeley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.10.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Employee representatives in firms are a potentially key but not yet studied source of the impact of unions and works councils. Their actions can shape multiple drivers of firm performance, including collective bargaining, strikes, and training. This article examines the impact of union representative mandates by exploiting legal membership thresholds present in many countries. In the case of Portugal, which we examine here, while firms employing up to forty‐nine union members are required to have one union representative; this increases to two (three) union reps for firms with fifty to ninety‐nine (100–199) union members. Drawing on matched employer–employee data on the unionized sector and regression discontinuity methods, we find that a one percentage point increase in the legal union representative/members ratio leads to an increase in firm performance of at least 7 percent. This result generally holds across multiple dimensions of firm performance and appears to be driven by increased training. However, we find no effects of union representatives on firm‐level wages, given the predominance of sectoral collective bargaining. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0019-8676 1468-232X |
DOI: | 10.1111/irel.12248 |