Lived experiences of subjective binge eating: An inductive thematic analysis

• Published in: The International journal of eating disorders Vol. 54; no. 12; pp. 2192 - 2205
• Main Authors: Brownstone, Lisa M., Mihas, Paul, Butler, Rachel, Maman, Suzanne, Peterson, Carol B., Bulik, Cynthia M., Bardone‐Cone, Anna M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.12.2021; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Binge eating; Binge-Eating Disorder - diagnosis; Bulimia; Bulimia - diagnosis; eating disorder; Eating disorders; emotion; Female; Humans; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; qualitative; subjective binge eating; Surveys and Questionnaires; thematic analysis; eating disorder; thematic analysis; emotion; subjective binge eating; qualitative; binge eating
• ISSN: 0276-3478; 1098-108X; 1098-108X
• DOI: 10.1002/eat.23636

Objective Growing evidence suggests that subjective binge eating (SBE; loss of control eating involving subjectively, but not objectively, large quantities of food) is clinically concerning even though it is not currently considered a diagnostic criterion for eating disorders. However, the lived experience of SBEs has not been examined in a systematic, and data‐driven way. Method The current study used a qualitative, inductive interview approach to further define SBEs as described by individuals who experience them. Participants (N = 14; 11 cisgender women, Mage = 35.29, 12 White/non‐Latinx) reported SBEs that occurred at least twice per week over the prior 3 months. We completed semi‐structured qualitative phone interviews with participants regarding their most recent SBE and objective binge‐eating episode (OBE) if applicable, as well as broader experiences and attitudes regarding non‐binge eating. Results Inductive, reflexive, thematic coding yielded descriptive and interpretive codes regarding SBEs. Main themes regarding SBE experience included: (a) SBEs Occur Across Contexts and Food Types, (b) SBEs Are Contrasts to General Over‐Control, (c) SBEs Are Distress‐ and Disconnection‐Inducing, Not Relieving, (d) SBEs Are Responses to Hunger and Restriction, and (e) SBEs Can Be “Echoes” of OBEs. Discussion The current study explored the lived experiences of those who report SBEs and provides an important foundation for hypothesis generation for future research on and clinical interventions for SBEs.