Neck dissection and ipsilateral radiotherapy in the management of cervical metastatic carcinoma from an unknown primary

Background: In a small proportion of patients presenting with metastases to cervical lymph nodes the primary cancer remains occult despite thorough evaluation. The present report examines patterns of failure and outcome following an initial treatment strategy directed principally at the clinically i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 263 - 268
Main Authors Mcmahon, J., Hruby, G., O'Brien, C. J., Mcneil, E. B., Bagia, J. S., Clifford, A. R., Jackson, M. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Science Pty 01.04.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: In a small proportion of patients presenting with metastases to cervical lymph nodes the primary cancer remains occult despite thorough evaluation. The present report examines patterns of failure and outcome following an initial treatment strategy directed principally at the clinically involved side of the neck. Methods: From a prospectively compiled computerized database 38 patients were identified with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma from an occult primary site. These patients were evaluated with respect to initial treatment, subsequent detection of a primary tumour, neck recurrence and survival characteristics. Results: Thirty‐seven of 38 patients were treated with curative intent and all had neck dissection. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 34 of the 37 (90%; 32 postoperatively and two pre‐operatively). Radiotherapy was directed at the ipsilateral neck alone in 24 patients while 10 received comprehensive treatment to both sides of the neck and potential occult primary sites. The rate of control of disease in the ipsilateral neck was 91% while the failure rate in the contralateral neck was 16% (six patients). A primary cancer was ultimately identified in five patients (13%). Disease‐specific survival was 63% at 4 years. Clinical N3 stage, extracapsular tumour extension and involved surgical margins predicted for poorer survival on univariate analysis. Analysis using multiple risk factors found that only involved surgical margins predicted for treatment failure. Conclusions: Despite generally advanced disease at presentation, patients presenting with cervical metastasis from an unknown primary carcinoma have a reasonable survival expectation and aggressive treatment is warranted, but approximately half will develop recurrent disease. Careful follow‐up is required if effective salvage treatment is to be instituted.
Bibliography:istex:3532DF52AC15DF8B8DB16BDD93B3F1F4AA4D65EA
ArticleID:ANS1804
ark:/67375/WNG-819PGHWK-L
ISSN:0004-8682
1445-2197
DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01804.x