Reframing resilience as resistance: Situating disaster recovery within colonialism

This paper challenges resilience literature, which often strips grassroots actors of their political agency and reduces their resilient actions to no more than adapting, mitigating or recovering from an exogenous hazard. I apply an everyday resistance framework to unpack Puerto Ricans’ responses to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Geographical journal Vol. 188; no. 1; pp. 14 - 27
Main Author Sou, Gemma
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper challenges resilience literature, which often strips grassroots actors of their political agency and reduces their resilient actions to no more than adapting, mitigating or recovering from an exogenous hazard. I apply an everyday resistance framework to unpack Puerto Ricans’ responses to the impacts of Hurricane Maria, which devastated the Caribbean Island in 2017. This methodological approach situates acts of resilience within the colonial relations that characterise the United States−Puerto Rico relationship. First, people’s acts of resilience are shown to signify acts of resistance to pursue self‐determination and relinquish their dependency on the United States for their everyday lives and disaster recovery. Second, the paper demonstrates how resistance is enacted by women in the domestic space, which challenges masculinist and patriarchal notions of resistance. Third, exploring resilience “from below” is suggested to expose how state‐centric conceptualisations of resilience do not fit neatly with how disaster‐affected people define and intuitively enact resilience. The paper argues that people's acts of resilience often signify acts of resistance. Resistance is enacted by women in the domestic space, which challenges masculinist and patriarchal notions of resistance. Exploring resilience “from below” exposes how state‐centric conceptualisations of resilience do not fit neatly with how disaster‐affected people define and enact resilience.
Bibliography:Funding information
Research Councils UK > Economic and Social Research Council.
ISSN:0016-7398
1475-4959
DOI:10.1111/geoj.12413