When Industrial Democracy Meets Corporate Social Responsibility — A Comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as Responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Industrial Democracy are two paradigmatic approaches to transnational labour governance. They differ considerably with regard to the role accorded to the representation of labour. CSR tends to view workers as passive recipients of corporate‐led initiatives,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of industrial relations Vol. 56; no. 1; pp. 14 - 42
Main Authors Donaghey, Jimmy, Reinecke, Juliane
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2018
Subjects
Alliances
Capacity building approach
Governance
Implementation
Industrial democracy
Labor
Labor relations
Representation
Social responsibility
Transnationalism
Workers
Bangladesh
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Industrial Democracy are two paradigmatic approaches to transnational labour governance. They differ considerably with regard to the role accorded to the representation of labour. CSR tends to view workers as passive recipients of corporate‐led initiatives, with little attention paid to the role of unions. Industrial Democracy centres on labour involvement: those affected by governance need to be part of it. Examining the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as governance responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster, this article offers a comparative perspective of how Industrial Democracy‐oriented and CSR‐oriented initiatives translate into differences in implementation. The article highlights that while CSR can foster effective problem‐solving in the short run, Industrial Democracy is necessary to build governance capacities involving workers in the long run.
ISSN:0007-1080
1467-8543
DOI:10.1111/bjir.12242