Exploratory evaluation of baseline cognition as a predictor of perceived benefit in a study of behavioral therapy for urinary incontinence in Parkinson disease
Aims While behavior‐based pelvic floor muscle exercise therapy is an effective treatment for overactive bladder in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, cognitive function may be a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes. Methods In a planned exploratory analysis, participants who had a Montreal Cogn...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurourology and urodynamics Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 841 - 846 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.03.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aims
While behavior‐based pelvic floor muscle exercise therapy is an effective treatment for overactive bladder in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, cognitive function may be a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes.
Methods
In a planned exploratory analysis, participants who had a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with a score ≥18 who were randomized in a clinical trial to behavioral treatment were classified by perceived improvement (Benefit vs. No Benefit) as reported on a validated Satisfaction and Benefit Questionnaire. General cognition (MoCA), motor procedural learning (Serial reaction time task), verbal memory (Buschke delayed recall), spatial memory (Nonverbal/Spatial selective reminding test), and working memory (Wisconsin card sorting task) were compared between the two groups using Wilcoxon rank‐sum test.
Results
Of the 26 participants randomized to behavioral treatment (70% male, mean age 71 ± 6.1 years), 22 participants (85%) reported Benefit and four reported No Benefit. General cognition, motor procedural learning, verbal memory, spatial memory, and working memory did not differ between these groups. While the difference between the time to complete the final practiced series and the random series of the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) was statistically similar between the groups, the Benefit group performed the random sequence more quickly (567.0 ± 136.5 ms) compared to the No Benefit group (959.4 ± 443.0 ms; p = 0.03) and trended toward faster performance in the final practiced series.
Conclusions
Perceived benefit from behavioral treatment for overactive bladder was not associated with measures of baseline cognition other than faster completion of the SRTT. This is noteworthy because many behavior‐based therapy studies exclude participants with mild cognitive impairment. Additional studies may evaluate if domain‐specific cognitive function, particularly the assessment of implicit memory, could lead to individualized behavioral therapy recommendations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Vaughan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, interpretation of data, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, final approval of version to be published Burgio: Conceptualization, Methodology, interpretation of data, Writing - review and editing, final approval of version to be published Muirhead: Data acquisition and interpretation of data, Writing - review and editing, final approval of version to be published Juncos: Conceptualization, Methodology, interpretation of data, Writing - review and editing, final approval of version to be published Chang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, interpretation of data, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, final approval of version to be published Johnson: Conceptualization, Methodology, interpretation of data, Writing - review and editing, final approval of version to be published Markland: Methodology, interpretation of data, Writing - review and editing, final approval of version to be published McGwin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, interpretation of data, Writing - review and editing, final approval of version to be published Author contributions Goldstein: Conceptualization, Methodology, interpretation of data, Writing - review and editing, final approval of version to be published |
ISSN: | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
DOI: | 10.1002/nau.24891 |