A multiple criteria decision making framework for regional aquaculture development

Aquaculture development is considered as a viable source for providing high quality cheap protein, particularly, for developing countries where protein shortage already exists. However, complexities in such development planning can be difficult without the aid of modern decision-aids such as multipl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of operational research Vol. 133; no. 3; pp. 462 - 482
Main Authors El-Gayar, Omar F., Leung, PingSun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 16.09.2001
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Subjects
Aquaculture
Aquaculture development
Compromise programming
Decision making
Developing countries
Goal programming
LDCs
Mathematical models
Multiple criteria decision making
Multiple objective programming
Proteins
Studies
Multiple criteria decision making
Aquaculture development
Multiple objective programming
Compromise programming
Goal programming
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0377-2217
1872-6860
DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00183-1

Cover

More Information
Summary:Aquaculture development is considered as a viable source for providing high quality cheap protein, particularly, for developing countries where protein shortage already exists. However, complexities in such development planning can be difficult without the aid of modern decision-aids such as multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) models. MCDM models are already in use in the business and manufacturing sectors. However, their use in agriculture is limited and their use in aquaculture is almost nonexistent. This paper presents a MCDM framework for the planning of regional aquaculture development. The MCDM model seeks a desirable allocation of resources and activity levels that strikes an acceptable balance among the various development goals under consideration subject to resource constraints, market constraints, and pollution constraints. To accommodate different decision situations, three different MCDM solution techniques are implemented, namely, multiple objective programming (MOP), compromise programming (CP), and weighted goal programming (WGP). The applicability of the framework is demonstrated through applying it to a case study from northern Egypt where aquaculture is a viable industry for supplying cheap and good quality protein, balancing the foreign exchange deficits, and creating employment opportunities.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0377-2217
1872-6860
DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00183-1