Assessing the impacts of minimum legal drinking age laws on police-reported violent victimization in Canada from 2009 to 2013

•This study employs a quasi-experimental design to evaluate drinking age laws.•The paper uses a national dataset of police-reported violent victimization events.•Men and women gaining the drinking age incur increases in violent victimization. Background/aim: Given that alcohol-related victimization...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDrug and alcohol dependence Vol. 197; pp. 65 - 72
Main Authors Benny, Claire, Gatley, Jodi M., Sanches, Marcos, Callaghan, Russell C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.04.2019
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•This study employs a quasi-experimental design to evaluate drinking age laws.•The paper uses a national dataset of police-reported violent victimization events.•Men and women gaining the drinking age incur increases in violent victimization. Background/aim: Given that alcohol-related victimization is highly prevalent among young adults, the current study aimed to assess the potential impacts of Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) laws on police-reported violent victimization events among young people. Design: A regression-discontinuity (RD) approach was applied to victimization data from the Canadian Uniform Crime Reporting 2 (UCR2) Incident-based survey from 2009-2013. Participants/cases: All police-reported violent victimization events (females: n = 178,566; males: n = 156,803) among youth aged 14–22 years in Canada. Measurements: Violent victimization events, primarily consisting of homicide, physical assault, sexual assault, and robbery. Results: In comparison to youth slightly younger than the drinking age, both males and females slightly older than MLDA had significant and immediate increases in police-reported violent victimization events (females: 13.5%, 95% CI: 7.5%–19.5%, p < 0.001; males: 11.6%, 95% CI: 6.6%–16.7%, p < 0.001). Victimizations occurring in the evening rose sharply immediately after the MLDA by 22.8% (95% CI: 9.9%–35.7%, p =  0.001) for females and 19.3% (95% CI: 11.5%–27.2%, p < 0.001) for males. Increases in violent victimization immediately after MLDA were most prominent in bar/restaurant/open-air settings, with victimizations rising sharply by 44.9% (95% CI: 29.5%–60.2%, p < 0.001) among females and 18.3% (95% CI: 7.7%–29.0%, p =  0.001) among males. Conclusions: Young people gaining minimum legal drinking age incur immediate increases in police-reported violent victimizations, especially those occurring in the evening and at bar/restaurant/open-air settings. Evidence suggests that increasing the MLDA may attenuate patterns of violent victimization in newly restricted age groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.025