Fluidized-bed Fenton coupled with ceramic membrane separation for advanced treatment of flax wastewater

• Published in: Journal of hazardous materials Vol. 340; pp. 390 - 398
• Main Authors: Fan, Dong, Ding, Lili, Huang, Hui, Chen, Mengtian, Ren, Hongqiang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.10.2017
• Subjects: Ceramic membrane; DOMs; EEM-PARAFAC; Flax wastewater; Fluidized-bed Fenton; Ceramic membrane; Flax wastewater; DOMs; EEM-PARAFAC; Fluidized-bed Fenton
• ISSN: 0304-3894; 1873-3336
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.055

•A novel fluidized bed Fenton-ceramic membrane reactor was used to treat flax secondary effluent.•Fluidized-bed Fenton coupled with ceramic membrane resulted in 84% TOC and 94% color removal.•EEM-PARAFAC identified four humic-like (M1–M4) and one protein-like components (M5).•Ceramic membrane (100nm) could intercept 10.4% macromolecules and 12.53% hydrophobic humic-like component (M2). Fluidized-bed Fenton coupled with ceramic membrane separation to treat the flax secondary effluent was investigated. The operating variables, including initial pH, dosage of H2O2 and Fe0, air flow rate, TMP and pore size, were optimized. The distributions of DOMs in the treatment process were analyzed. Under the optimum condition (600mgL−1H2O2, 1.4gL−1 Fe0, pH=3, 300Lh−1 air flow rate and 15psi TMP), the highest TOC and color removal efficiencies were 84% and 94% in the coupled reactor with 100nm ceramic membrane, reducing 39% of total iron with similar removal efficiency compared with Fluidized-bed Fenton. Experimental results showed that the ceramic membrane could intercept catalyst particles (average particle size >100nm), 10.4% macromolecules organic matter (AMW>20000Da) and 12.53% hydrophobic humic-like component. EEM-PARAFAC identified four humic-like (M1–M4) and one protein-like components (M5), and the fluorescence intensities of M1–M5 in the secondary effluent were 63.27, 63.05, 33.41, 16.71 and 0.72 QSE, respectively. After the coupled treatment, the removal efficiencies of M1(81%), M2(86%) were higher than M3, M4(63%, 61%). Pearson correlation analysis suggested that M1, M2 and M3 were the major contributors to the cake layer, and M4, M5 might more easily lead to pore blockages.