An exergetic performance assessment of three different food driers

Abstract In this study, plum slices were dried in three different driers (tray, fluid bed, and heat pump (HP) driers). Drying experiments were carried out at an air temperature range of 45-55 °C with an air velocity of 1.5 m/s. The performance of the driers along with their main components was evalu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A, Journal of power and energy Vol. 224; no. 1; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Hepbasli, A, Erbay, Z, Colak, N, Hancioglu, E, Icier, F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2010
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract In this study, plum slices were dried in three different driers (tray, fluid bed, and heat pump (HP) driers). Drying experiments were carried out at an air temperature range of 45-55 °C with an air velocity of 1.5 m/s. The performance of the driers along with their main components was evaluated and compared by using the exergy analysis method. The most important component for improving the system efficiency was determined to be the fan—heater combination for both the tray and fluid bed driers, and the motor—compressor assembly for the HP drier. The exergy loss and flow diagram (the so-called Grassmann diagram) of the driers was also presented to give quantitative information regarding the proportion of the exergy input dissipated in the various system components. Effects of the drying air temperature on the performance of the drying process were discussed. The highest exergetic efficiency values were obtained to range from 72.72 to 75.66 per cent for the HP drier, followed by the tray and fluid bed driers varying between 37.94 and 39.46 per cent, and between 22.83 and 24.07 per cent, respectively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0957-6509
2041-2967
DOI:10.1243/09576509JPE802