Macrofaunal patterns and animal–sediment relationships in Uruguayan estuaries and coastal lagoons (Atlantic coast of South America)

• Published in: Journal of sea research Vol. 87; pp. 46 - 55
• Main Authors: Giménez, L., Venturini, N., Kandratavicius, N., Hutton, M., Lanfranconi, A., Rodríguez, M., Brugnoli, E., Muniz, P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier B.V 01.03.2014; Elsevier
• Subjects: Abundance; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animal–Sediment Relationships; Benthos; Biological and medical sciences; Bivalvia; Brackish water ecosystems; Coastal environments; Coastal Lagoons; Communities; Erodona mactroides; Estuaries; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Habitats; Laeonereis acuta; Lagoons; Sand; Sea water ecosystems; Sediments; Succinea; Synecology; South America; Uruguay; America; ASW, South America; ASW, Uruguay; Estuaries; Benthos; Coastal Lagoons; Animal–Sediment Relationships; Marine environment; Brackish water environment; Fauna; Macrofauna; Sediments; Animal-Sediment Relationships; Coastal lagoon
• ISSN: 1385-1101; 1873-1414
• DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2013.12.005

Estuaries vary considerably in geomorphology, hydrology and in the properties of sediments. Structure of benthic communities may respond to the interaction of these estuarine characteristics, resulting in between site differences. This work evaluated several hypothetical scenarios to explain variation in macrofaunal communities in permanently open estuaries and open/closed coastal lagoons of the coast of Uruguay, South America. Of particular relevance were three hypothetical scenarios: (1) that sediment characteristics, temperature or conductivity may explain variation in fauna between estuarine habitat types (estuaries vs. lagoons), (2) that fauna may not vary between habitat types, but may vary among sites in response to environmental variables and (3) that fauna differed between habitat types but patterns were not clearly being mediated by the measured environmental variables. Scenario 1 was discarded because none of the observed environmental variables showed a significant habitat effect. Patterns of species richness differed between lagoons and estuaries in accordance with scenario 3; richness was higher in open/closed lagoons than in estuaries. The abundance of three important infaunal species supported scenario 2: these species varied considerably among sites in response to the proportion of different sand fractions. Fine sands, common in all estuaries and in a lagoon, were characterised by polychaetes (Laeonereis acuta and Alitta succinea) whereas coarse sands, found in two lagoons were characterised by a bivalve, Erodona mactroides. Another three species responded to sediment but did not show clear site to site variation in abundance. Lagoons differ from estuaries in their higher site to site variation in sediment composition and in the diversity of community variants: lagoons may therefore increase regional diversity as compared to estuaries. We conclude that sediment type played a strong role in explaining variations in macrofaunal abundance among estuaries and lagoons. •In Uruguay, coastal lagoons have higher macrobenthic species richness than estuaries.•Sediment composition drives variations in the abundance of the most common species.•Lagoons differ in their sediment composition and harbour two contrasting communities.•Estuaries do not differ in their sediment composition and harbour a single community.•Overall, lagoons differ from estuaries in their higher diversity of community types.