Randomized Comparison of the Stanford V Regimen and ABVD in the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244

This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL): the weekly alternating Stanford V and the standard, twice-weekly regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 27; no. 32; pp. 5390 - 5396
Main Authors HOSKIN, Peter J, LOWRY, Lisa, PETTITT, Andrew, CUNNINGHAM, David, PETTENGELL, Ruth, SWEETENHAM, John, LINCH, David, JOHNSON, Peter W. M, HORWICH, Alan, JACK, Andrew, MEAD, Ben, HANCOCK, Barry W, SMITH, Paul, WENDI QIAN, PATRICK, Philippa, POPOVA, Bilyana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Alexandria, VA American Society of Clinical Oncology 10.11.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL): the weekly alternating Stanford V and the standard, twice-weekly regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Patients had stage IIB, III, or IV disease or had stages I to IIA disease with bulky disease or other adverse features. Radiotherapy was administered in both arms to sites of previous bulk (> 5 cm) and to splenic deposits, although this was omitted in the latter part of the trial for patients achieving complete remission (CR) in the ABVD arm. A total of 520 patients were randomly assigned and were assessed for the primary outcome measure of progression-free survival (PFS). Five hundred patients received protocol treatment, and radiotherapy was administered to 73% in the Stanford V arm and to 53% in the ABVD arm. The overall response rates after completion of all treatment were 91% for Stanford V and 92% for ABVD. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, there was no evidence of a difference in projected 5-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates (76% and 90%, respectively, for ABVD; 74% and 92%, respectively, for Stanford V). More pulmonary toxicity was reported for ABVD, whereas other toxicities were more frequent with Stanford V. In a large, randomized trial, the efficacies of Stanford V and ABVD were comparable when given in combination with appropriate radiotherapy.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3239