Extremely low fine root biomass in Larix sibirica forests at the southern drought limit of the boreal forest

Mongolia's Larix sibirica forests at the southern fringe of the Eurosiberian boreal forest belt are exposed not only to very low winter temperatures, but also to frequent summer droughts. It is not completely known how Siberian larch adapts to these stressors. We examined whether (i) these fore...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFlora. Morphologie, Geobotanik, Oekophysiologie Vol. 208; no. 8-9; pp. 488 - 496
Main Authors Chenlemuge, Tselmeg, Hertel, Dietrich, Dulamsuren, Choimaa, Khishigjargal, Mookhor, Leuschner, Christoph, Hauck, Markus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier GmbH 01.08.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mongolia's Larix sibirica forests at the southern fringe of the Eurosiberian boreal forest belt are exposed not only to very low winter temperatures, but also to frequent summer droughts. It is not completely known how Siberian larch adapts to these stressors. We examined whether (i) these forests differ in their fine root bio- and necromass from more humid boreal forests further in the North and (ii) inter-annual fluctuations in fine root biomass are related to tree vitality. In two exceptionally dry summers, we found only 4–5g DM m−2 of fine root biomass (in 0–20cm depth), which is far less than typical conifer fine root biomass figures from boreal forests (c. 200–400gm−2) and the lowest forest fine root biomass reported worldwide; in a moist summer, fine root biomass was 20 fold higher. In contrast to fine root biomass, both necromass and non-tree root mass were high in all three years. From the large increase of fine root biomass in the moist summer and the generally high root necromass, we conclude that drought-induced fine root dieback was the likely cause of the very small amount of live root mass in the dry summers. Larch fine roots seem to be more drought-sensitive than shoots, since marked needle loss did not occur under the extreme conditions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0367-2530
1618-0585
DOI:10.1016/j.flora.2013.08.002