Markerless positional verification using template matching and triangulation of kV images acquired during irradiation for lung tumors treated in breath-hold

Lung tumors treated in breath-hold are subject to inter- and intra-breath-hold variations, which makes tumor position monitoring during each breath-hold important. A markerless technique is desirable, but limited tumor visibility on kV images makes this challenging. We evaluated if template matching...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics in medicine & biology Vol. 63; no. 11; pp. 115005 - 115022
Main Authors Hazelaar, Colien, Dahele, Max, Mostafavi, Hassan, van der Weide, Lineke, Slotman, Ben, Verbakel, Wilko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England IOP Publishing 29.05.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lung tumors treated in breath-hold are subject to inter- and intra-breath-hold variations, which makes tumor position monitoring during each breath-hold important. A markerless technique is desirable, but limited tumor visibility on kV images makes this challenging. We evaluated if template matching  +  triangulation of kV projection images acquired during breath-hold stereotactic treatments could determine 3D tumor position. Band-pass filtering and/or digital tomosynthesis (DTS) were used as image pre-filtering/enhancement techniques. On-board kV images continuously acquired during volumetric modulated arc irradiation of (i) a 3D-printed anthropomorphic thorax phantom with three lung tumors (n  =  6 stationary datasets, n  =  2 gradually moving), and (ii) four patients (13 datasets) were analyzed. 2D reference templates (filtered DRRs) were created from planning CT data. Normalized cross-correlation was used for 2D matching between templates and pre-filtered/enhanced kV images. For 3D verification, each registration was triangulated with multiple previous registrations. Generally applicable image processing/algorithm settings for lung tumors in breath-hold were identified. For the stationary phantom, the interquartile range of the 3D position vector was on average 0.25 mm for 12° DTS  +  band-pass filtering (average detected positions in 2D  =  99.7%, 3D  =  96.1%, and 3D excluding first 12° due to triangulation angle  =  99.9%) compared to 0.81 mm for band-pass filtering only (55.8/52.9/55.0%). For the moving phantom, RMS errors for the lateral/longitudinal/vertical direction after 12° DTS  +  band-pass filtering were 1.5/0.4/1.1 mm and 2.2/0.3/3.2 mm. For the clinical data, 2D position was determined for at least 93% of each dataset and 3D position excluding first 12° for at least 82% of each dataset using 12° DTS  +  band-pass filtering. Template matching  +  triangulation using DTS  +  band-pass filtered images could accurately determine the position of stationary lung tumors. However, triangulation was less accurate/reliable for targets with continuous, gradual displacement in the lateral and vertical directions. This technique is therefore currently most suited to detect/monitor offsets occurring between initial setup and the start of treatment, inter-breath-hold variations, and tumors with predominantly longitudinal motion.
Bibliography:PMB-106822.R2
Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aac1a9