Optimal protection against Salmonella infection requires noncirculating memory

While CD4 Th1 cells are required for resistance to intramacrophage infections, adoptive transfer of Th1 cells is insufficient to protect against Salmonella infection. Using an epitope-tagged vaccine strain of Salmonella, we found that effective protection correlated with expanded Salmonella-specific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 115; no. 41; pp. 10416 - 10421
Main Authors Benoun, Joseph M., Peres, Newton G., Wang, Nancy, Pham, Oanh H., Rudisill, Victoria L., Fogassy, Zachary N., Whitney, Paul G., Fernandez-Ruiz, Daniel, Gebhardt, Thomas, Pham, Quynh-Mai, Puddington, Lynn, Bedoui, Sammy, Strugnell, Richard A., McSorley, Stephen J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 09.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While CD4 Th1 cells are required for resistance to intramacrophage infections, adoptive transfer of Th1 cells is insufficient to protect against Salmonella infection. Using an epitope-tagged vaccine strain of Salmonella, we found that effective protection correlated with expanded Salmonella-specific memory CD4 T cells in circulation and nonlymphoid tissues. However, naive mice that previously shared a blood supply with vaccinated partners lacked T cell memory with characteristics of tissue residence and did not acquire robust protective immunity. Using a YFP–IFN-γ reporter system, we identified Th1 cells in the liver of immunized mice that displayed markers of tissue residence, including P2X7, ARTC2, LFA-1, and CD101. Adoptive transfer of liver memory cells after ARTC2 blockade increased protection against highly virulent bacteria. Taken together, these data demonstrate that noncirculating memory Th1 cells are a vital component of immunity to Salmonella infection and should be the focus of vaccine strategies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
1J.M.B., N.G.P., N.W., S.B., R.A.S., and S.J.M. contributed equally to this work.
Edited by Harvey Cantor, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, and approved August 27, 2018 (received for review May 15, 2018)
Author contributions: J.M.B., N.G.P., N.W., T.G., L.P., S.B., R.A.S., and S.J.M. designed research; J.M.B., N.G.P., N.W., O.H.P., V.L.R., Z.N.F., P.G.W., D.F.-R., Q.-M.P., L.P., and S.J.M. performed research; J.M.B., N.G.P., N.W., O.H.P., V.L.R., Z.N.F., P.G.W., D.F.-R., T.G., Q.-M.P., L.P., S.B., R.A.S., and S.J.M. analyzed data; and J.M.B., N.G.P., N.W., S.B., R.A.S., and S.J.M. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1808339115