Indirect Shared Control for Cooperative Driving Between Driver and Automation in Steer-by-Wire Vehicles

It is widely acknowledged that drivers should remain in the control loop before automated vehicles completely meet real-world operational conditions. This paper presents an "indirect shared control" framework for steer-by-wire vehicles, which allows the control authority to be continuously...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems Vol. 22; no. 12; pp. 7826 - 7836
Main Authors Li, Renjie, Li, Yanan, Li, Shengbo Eben, Zhang, Chaofei, Burdet, Etienne, Cheng, Bo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.12.2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is widely acknowledged that drivers should remain in the control loop before automated vehicles completely meet real-world operational conditions. This paper presents an "indirect shared control" framework for steer-by-wire vehicles, which allows the control authority to be continuously shared between the driver and automation through an weighted-input-summation method. A "best-response" driver steering model based on model predictive control (MPC) for indirect shared control is proposed. Unlike any conventional driver model for manual driving, this model assumes that drivers can learn and incorporate the controller strategy into their internal model for predictive path following. The analytic solution to the driver model is provided to enable off-line simulations. A driving-simulator experiment was conducted to demonstrate the advantages of the indirect shared control system in a highway lane-keeping task. The result showed that the proposed indirect shared control method was effective to improve the subjects' lane-keeping performance and reduce steering control effort. The proposed driver steering model was also validated by the experiment data, which produced a smaller prediction error than the conventional MPC driver model.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1524-9050
1558-0016
DOI:10.1109/TITS.2020.3010620