Functional responses in polar bear habitat selection

• Published in: Oikos Vol. 100; no. 1; pp. 112 - 124
• Main Authors: Mauritzen, Mette, Belikov, Stanislav E., Boltunov, Andrei N., Derocher, Andrew E., Hansen, Edmond, Ims, Rolf A., Wiig, Øystein, Yoccoz, Nigel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copenhagen Munksgaard International Publishers 01.01.2003; Blackwell Publishers
• Subjects: Habitat conservation; Habitat selection; Habitats; Ice; Land; Polar bears; Seals; Seas; Summer; Winter
• ISSN: 0030-1299; 1600-0706
• DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12056.x

Habitat selection may occur in situations in which animals experience a trade-off, e.g. between the use of habitats with abundant forage and the use of safer retreat habitats with little forage. Such trade-offs may yield relative habitat use conditional on the relative availability of the different habitat types, as proportional use of foraging habitat may exceed proportional availability when foraging habitat is scarce, but be less than availability when foraging habitat is abundant. Hence, trade-offs in habitat use may result in functional responses in habitat use (i.e. change in relative use with changing availability). We used logistic and log-linear models to model functional responses in female polar bear habitat use based on satellite telemetry data from two contiguous populations; one near shore inhabiting sea ice within fjords, and one inhabiting pelagic drift ice. Open ice, near the ice edge, is a highly dynamic habitat hypothesised to be important polar bear habitat due to high prey availability. In open ice-polar bears may experience a high energetic cost of movements and risk drifting away from the main ice field (i.e. trade off between feeding and energy saving or safety). If polar bears were constrained by ice dynamics we therefore predicted use of retreat habitats with greater ice coverage relative to habitats used for hunting. The polar bears demonstrated season and population specific functional responses in habitat use, likely reflecting seasonal and regional variation in use of retreat and foraging habitats. We suggest that in seasons with functional responses in habitat use, polar bear space use and population distribution may not be a mere reflection of prey availability but rather reflect the alternate allocation of time in hunting and retreat habitats.