Best practices for the development, analytical validation and clinical implementation of flow cytometric methods for chimeric antigen receptor T cell analyses
Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells are recognized as efficacious therapies with demonstrated ability to produce durable responses in blood cancer patients. Regulatory approvals and acceptance of these unique therapies by patients and reimbursement agencies have led to a significant increase in...
Saved in:
Published in | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Vol. 100; no. 1; pp. 79 - 91 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.01.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells are recognized as efficacious therapies with demonstrated ability to produce durable responses in blood cancer patients. Regulatory approvals and acceptance of these unique therapies by patients and reimbursement agencies have led to a significant increase in the number of next generation CAR T clinical trials. Flow cytometry is a powerful tool for comprehensive profiling of individual CAR T cells at multiple stages of clinical development, from product characterization during manufacturing to longitudinal evaluation of the infused product in patients. There are unique challenges with regard to the development and validation of flow cytometric methods for CAR T cells; moreover, the assay requirements for manufacturing and clinical monitoring differ. Based on the collective experience of the authors, this recommendation paper aims to review these challenges and present approaches to address them. The discussion focuses on describing key considerations for the design, optimization, validation and implementation of flow cytometric methods during the clinical development of CAR T cell therapies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-4 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1552-4949 1552-4957 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cyto.b.21985 |