Tunnel lining design in multi-layered grounds

•Improved HRM model for the tunnel lining design in multi-layered grounds.•The thickness and the position of the weaker intermediate layer have a strong impact on the tunnel lining behaviour.•A reduction of the upward pressure applied on the lower half of the tunnel for the HRM model needs to be con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTunnelling and underground space technology Vol. 81; pp. 103 - 111
Main Authors Do, Ngoc-Anh, Dias, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2018
Elsevier BV
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Improved HRM model for the tunnel lining design in multi-layered grounds.•The thickness and the position of the weaker intermediate layer have a strong impact on the tunnel lining behaviour.•A reduction of the upward pressure applied on the lower half of the tunnel for the HRM model needs to be considered. Multi-layered grounds are usually encountered during tunnel excavations. However, tunnel design methods often adopted the homogeneous ground assumption for the sake of simplicity. This paper focuses on improving the performance of the Hyperstatic Reaction Method (HRM), which is part of the numerical method category, in the case of multi-layered grounds. A special attention is paid to the change of the weaker ground layer’s position over the cross-section of the tunnel and of the ground layer’s thickness. The numerical HRM model was validated based on a comparison with monitoring data from a real site and with those of finite element (FEM) models for different cases of multi-layered grounds. The results indicated that a reduction of the upward pressure applied on the lower half of the tunnel for the HRM model needs to be considered. Using the HRM model, a parametric study was conducted to highlight the significant dependency of the tunnel lining to the position and the thickness of the weaker ground layer.
ISSN:0886-7798
1878-4364
DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.005