The epistemic and strategic dimension of the establishment of the IPBES: "epistemic selectivities" at work

The economic valuation of biodiversity and related market-based policy instruments are increasingly being referred to in the international politics of biodiversity and related Multilateral Environmental Agreements. They are both the subject of diverging interests, hence leading to conflict and criti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInnovation (Abingdon, England) Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 361 - 378
Main Author Vadrot, Alice B.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 02.10.2014
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Biodiversity
CBD
Conflict
Contracts
Decision Making
Economic Crises
Economic crisis
ecosystem service
Ecosystems
Environmental policy
epistemic selectivities
Epistemology
Institutional change
International agreements
International politics
IPBES
Knowledge
Marginality
Politics
Valuation
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1351-1610
1469-8412
DOI10.1080/13511610.2014.962014

Cover

More Information
Summary:The economic valuation of biodiversity and related market-based policy instruments are increasingly being referred to in the international politics of biodiversity and related Multilateral Environmental Agreements. They are both the subject of diverging interests, hence leading to conflict and critique, and an impetus for compromise on the way toward a "reasonable" solution to the environmental and economic crises. This development coincides with an extensive debate on how to increase the profile of biodiversity science and make it more policy relevant. This article takes a close look at decision-making processes leading to the establishment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Particular emphasis is placed on the implicit and explicit conflicts around the significance attached to the concept of ecosystem services within the IPBES debate. The article is based on the assumption that struggles over biodiversity knowledge become marginalized in favor of a stabilization of the "global paradigm of valorization." In this vein, the concept of ecosystem services contributes to sustaining the rationale that biodiversity can only be preserved if its diverse elements are commodified. This is theoretically underpinned by the concept of "epistemic selectivities," and I discuss its contribution to the understanding of the role of knowledge in institutional change.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1351-1610
1469-8412
DOI:10.1080/13511610.2014.962014