A feasibility study evaluating docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens in the adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer

Background and purpose: Docetaxel is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapies for patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients and methods: Three consecutive groups o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of oncology Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 169 - 175
Main Authors Di Leo, A., Crown, J., Nogaret, J.-M., Duffy, K., Bartholomeus, S., Dolci, S., Rowan, S., O'Higgins, N., Paesmans, M., Larsimont, D., Riva, A., Piccart, M. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.02.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and purpose: Docetaxel is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of docetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapies for patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients and methods: Three consecutive groups of patients with node-positive breast cancer or locally-advanced disease, aged ≤ 70 years, received one of the following regimens: a) sequential A → T → CMF: doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 q 3 weeks × 3, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 q 3 weeks × 3, followed by i.v. CMF days 1 + 8 q 4 weeks × 3; b) sequential accelerated A → T -→ CMF: A and T were administered at the same doses q 2 weeks; c) combination therapy: doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q 3 weeks × 4, followed by CMF × 4. When indicated, radiotherapy was administered during or after CMF, and tamoxifen started after the end of CMF. Results: Seventy-nine patients have been treated. Median age was 48 years. A 30% rate of early treatment discontinuation was observed in patients receiving the sequential accelerated therapy (23% during A → T), due principally to severe skin toxicity. Median relative dose-intensity was 100% in the three treatment arms. The incidence of G3-G4 major toxicities by treated patients, was as follows: skin toxicity a: 5%; b: 27%; c: 0%; stomatitis a: 20%; b: 20%; c: 3%. The incidence of neutropenic fever was a: 30%; b: 13%; c: 48%. After a median follow-up of 18 months, no late toxicity has been reported. Conclusions: The accelerated sequential A → T → CMF treatment is not feasible due to an excess of skin toxicity. The sequential non accelerated and the combination regimens are feasible and under evaluation in a phase III trial of adjuvant therapy.
Bibliography:ArticleID:11.2.169
istex:243BF29481B8BB9DEABB4201E83FD922533EE9DF
ark:/67375/HXZ-L2V1BD88-6
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1023/A:1008345432342