A four year follow-up survey on the teledidactic TELUS ultrasound course: long-term benefits and implications

• Published in: BMC medical education Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 1022 - 7
• Main Authors: Höhne, Elena, Schäfer, Valentin S, Neubauer, Ricarda, Gotta, Jennifer, Reschke, Philipp, Wittek, Agnes, Recker, Florian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 18.09.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Clinical Competence; Control Groups; Coronary vessels; Course Content; COVID-19; Curricula; Curriculum; Curriculum development; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic; Education; Education, Distance; Education, Medical - methods; Educational Objectives; Evaluation; Feedback (Response); Female; Follow-Up Studies; Handheld Devices; Humans; Male; Measurement Techniques; Medical education; Medical students; Medicine; Methods; Online education; Outcomes of Education; Pandemics; Physicians; Practice; Pretesting; Questionnaires; Rating Scales; SARS-CoV-2; Specialization; Study and teaching; Surveys and Questionnaires; Teaching; Technology application; Telemedicine; Thyroid gland; Training; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound; Urogenital system; Germany; United States > US; Training; Medical education; Telemedicine; Education; Ultrasound; Curriculum development
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05993-z

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional medical education, prompting innovative teaching methods for practical skills training. The teledidactic TELUS ultrasound course, launched in 2020-2021, aimed to provide remote instruction in ultrasound techniques. This study assesses the long-term impact of the teledidactic ultrasound course conducted during the study years on current clinical practice. In 2024, a follow-up survey was conducted with former TELUS course students now practicing as physicians across various specialities. Participants rated their confidence in ultrasound examinations and its frequency in practice. 21 out of 30 participants (70%) completed the survey. 71.4% rated the course experience as excellent (5/5 points). Most reported significant learning gains, especially in the FAST module. While all agreed the course enhanced their ultrasound skills, its impact on patient care received mixed reviews. Frequency of ultrasound use varied widely among specialities, with high use in surgery and internal medicine but less in psychiatry, neurology, and ophthalmology. Notably, 42,9% had not pursued further ultrasound training post-course. The teledidactic ultrasound course effectively provided remote education, integrating skills into practice. Mixed reviews on patient care impact and speciality-specific ultrasound use suggest sustained integration depends on relevance and ongoing education. Self-assessment results support online ultrasound courses, indicating potential use in resource-limited or geographically constrained settings.