Chemo-Cryo Combination Therapy: An Adjunctive Model for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Despite continuing research and the development of alternate therapeutic options, prostate cancer remains problematic. Chemotherapy has played a minor role as a treatment option due to its lack of efficacy. Whereas cryotherapy has received renewed attention as a treatment modality, it too fails to o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCryobiology Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 274 - 285
Main Authors Clarke, Dominic M., Baust, John M., Van Buskirk, Robert G., Baust, John G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published San Diego, CA Elsevier Inc 01.06.2001
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite continuing research and the development of alternate therapeutic options, prostate cancer remains problematic. Chemotherapy has played a minor role as a treatment option due to its lack of efficacy. Whereas cryotherapy has received renewed attention as a treatment modality, it too fails to offer an absolute curative option. Previously, we reported on the utilization of a therapeutic model, which, in combination, increases cell death in a canine renal cell model. Based upon that study, we investigated a combination therapy model as an alternative for the treatment modality for prostate cancer. We hypothesized that the combination of chemotherapy and cryosurgery would result in enhanced cell death, thereby presenting a more effective treatment of prostate cancer. A human prostate cancer cell (PC-3) model was exposed to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for 2 and 4 days (prefreeze), freezing (−5 to −100°C), or a combination of the two treatments, and each was assessed for effectiveness over a 2-week posttreatment period. Additionally, investigation into the mechanisms of cell death initiated by the respective therapies was performed through DNA cleavage analysis. For chemotherapy, cultures exposed to 5-FU (2–4 days) yielded a 15–25% loss in cell survival. For cryotherapy, cultures exposed to a temperature window of −5 to −20°C yielded an initial 5–70% loss of viability but cells propagated over time. Cultures exposed to temperatures of −25 to −80°C yielded a 90–99% (±4.5%) initial loss in viability with repopulation observed by 12 days postthaw. Cells frozen to −100°C yielded 100% (±0.3%) loss of viability and exhibited no signs of propagation. For chemo-cryo therapy, combination treatment at milder temperatures (−5 to −25°C) resulted in an enhanced loss of cell viability compared to that for either treatment alone. Combination treatment at lower temperatures (−40 to −80°C) resulted in a complete loss of cell viability. DNA fragmentation analysis at 48 h posttreatment revealed that dead (detached) cells treated with 5-FU died primarily through apoptosis, whereas dead cells from freezing (−15°C) alone died primarily through freeze-rupture and necrosis. Detached cell analysis from combination treatment at −15°C revealed the presence of apoptotic, necrotic, and freeze-rupture cell death. Scanning electron micrographs of cells exposed to freezing contributing to cell death. These data demonstrate that the combination of 5-FU at sublethal doses and freezing temperatures improves human prostate cancer cell death efficacy. Further, we suggest that chemo-cryo therapy offers a potential alternative treatment for the control and eradication of prostate cancer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0011-2240
1090-2392
DOI:10.1006/cryo.2001.2333