analysis of historical trends in classical biological control of arthropods suggests need for a new centralized database in the USA

The documentation of biological control agents targeting arthropods in the United States has historically been subject to less regulation relative to weed biological control releases. This study reviews publicly available databases to track environmental releases of biological control agents targeti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiocontrol science and technology Vol. 19; no. 7-8; pp. 675 - 688
Main Authors Warner, K.D, Getz, C, Maurano, S, Powers, K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.08.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The documentation of biological control agents targeting arthropods in the United States has historically been subject to less regulation relative to weed biological control releases. This study reviews publicly available databases to track environmental releases of biological control agents targeting arthropods in the United States. It then presents available data for the states with the most releases between 1962 and 2005: Hawaii, California and Florida. These data indicate a clear decline in rates of introduction since 1982 or 1994, depending on the source. Existing record-keeping systems offer incomplete or inconsistent data for evaluation because they were designed with limited goals, attempt to capture excessive detail and are thus impractical, or are insufficiently resourced. Existing databases cannot be used to answer meaningful questions regarding non-target effects of introduced control agents. Current databases are inappropriately designed and insufficiently resourced to meet today's research and regulatory needs. We propose and describe a new database system for classical biological control of arthropods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0958-3157
1360-0478
DOI:10.1080/09583150903033610