First decadal response to treatment in a disturbance-based silviculture experiment in Maine

• Published in: Forest ecology and management Vol. 262; no. 3; pp. 404 - 412
• Main Authors: Arseneault, Justin E., Saunders, Mike R., Seymour, Robert S., Wagner, Robert G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.08.2011; Elsevier
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Biological and medical sciences; Density; Disturbance-based silviculture; Disturbances; Expanding gap; Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration; Forestry; Forests; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gaps; Harvesting; Irregular shelterwood; Pine; Recruitment; Regeneration; Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration; Synecology; Terrestrial ecosystems; Canada; USA, Maine; Regeneration; Expanding gap; Disturbance-based silviculture; Irregular shelterwood; Response; Expanding; Silviculture; Irregularity; Forestry; Forest ecology; Experimentation; Perturbation
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.006

► Regeneration response of two gap-based harvest systems was similar after a decade. ► Overstory growth and sapling recruitment was higher in gap than intact forest. ► Species-specific responses differed strongly by proximity to harvest gap. ► Short-term differences may lead to profoundly different stand-level responses over time. Disturbance-based silvicultural systems generally seek to promote complex stand structures that are consistent with temporal and spatial patterns of natural disturbance while allowing for the sustainable harvest of timber. Gap-based harvesting systems are commonly used within this framework because they can be designed to approximate the frequencies and spatial patterns of a wide array of disturbance regimes. Patterns in stand-level growth, sapling recruitment and regeneration response were examined for one such gap-based system, the Acadian Forest Ecosystem Research Program (AFERP) in central Maine, that was designed to emulate the annual 1% disturbance frequency typical of the northeastern United States and Canada. A decade after treatment, stand-level differences in basal area growth and density between two gap-based treatments and an unharvested control were not statistically significant, largely due to low replication, but within-stand growth and regeneration responses differed strongly by spatial position relative to harvest gaps. Regeneration of shade-tolerant and intolerant species increased regardless of gap size, likely a response to increasing light availability from canopy openings due to harvesting and mortality. Further, there was evidence of gap size effects on sapling recruitment as large gaps (>1000 m 2) favored the growth and survival of mid-successional species such as red maple and white pine, while small gaps (<1000 m 2) favored late-succession species such as eastern hemlock and spruce. Overstory growth rates also differed by both species and position relative to harvest gaps with most species growing best in gaps and better along gap edges than in adjacent forest. Notably, overstory growth rates for white pine were not influenced by spatial position. These results suggest harvest gaps may have significant growth and regeneration impacts in adjacent, yet unharvested areas, which could lead to profound differences in forest development over the rotation. Obviously, longer-term studies of gap-based systems are needed to more clearly elucidate these responses.