Zoogeochemistry of a protected area: Driven by anthropogenic impacts and animal behavior

• Published in: Conservation science and practice Vol. 6; no. 5
• Main Authors: Trepel, Jonas, Abraham, Andrew J., Lundgren, Erick J., Ferraro, Kristy M., Fløjgaard, Camilla, Haugaard, Lars, Sunde, Peter, Pedersen, Rasmus Ø., Tietje, Melanie, Kamp, Johannes, Roux, Elizabeth
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.05.2024; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Agriculture; Animal behavior; Animal populations; Anthropogenic factors; anthropogenic impact; Biodiversity; Biodiversity loss; Cervus elaphus; conservation biology; Deer; Ecosystems; Eutrophication; Global positioning systems; GPS; Habitat selection; Habitats; Human influences; Hunting; Influence; large herbivores; management; nature conservation; Nutrient balance; Nutrient loss; Nutrients; Protected areas; Vegetation; Wildlife; Wildlife management; zoogeochemistry; Denmark; Europe
• ISSN: 2578-4854; 2578-4854
• DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13107

Anthropogenic eutrophication of ecosystems is an important driver of biodiversity loss. Even protected areas (PAs) may be impacted by anthropogenic nutrients, for example, from atmospheric deposition or the provision of supplementary feeding. However, the resultant nutrient patterns, and the role of local wildlife in shaping them, remain poorly understood. We investigated anthropogenic influences on the role that red deer (Cervus elaphus) play in the nutrient balance of a PA in Denmark. We used habitat selection modeling and theoretical scenarios where we varied the proportion of energy the deer obtained from supplementary versus natural forage and compared it with the nutrients removed due to hunting. We show that the movement and distribution of the red deer population within the PA are very heterogeneous and likely influenced by the need for shelter. Moreover, depending on their reliance on supplementary feeding, deer can potentially import large amounts of nutrients to the PA, and concentrate them in localized hotspots. However, we also explore the potential for nutrient loss due to hunting activities. Such indirect anthropogenic impacts on nutrient landscapes may counteract restoration and conservation efforts. We therefore recommend incorporating anthropogenic influences on zoogeochemistry and the animal‐mediated connectivity between PAs and anthropogenically dominated landscapes into future management plans.