Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application

Topographic measurements for detailed studies of processes such as erosion or mass movement are usually acquired by expensive laser scanners or rigorous photogrammetry. Here, we test and use an alternative technique based on freely available computer vision software which allows general geoscientist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Vol. 117; no. F3
Main Authors James, M. R., Robson, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2012
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Topographic measurements for detailed studies of processes such as erosion or mass movement are usually acquired by expensive laser scanners or rigorous photogrammetry. Here, we test and use an alternative technique based on freely available computer vision software which allows general geoscientists to easily create accurate 3D models from field photographs taken with a consumer‐grade camera. The approach integrates structure‐from‐motion (SfM) and multiview‐stereo (MVS) algorithms and, in contrast to traditional photogrammetry techniques, it requires little expertise and few control measurements, and processing is automated. To assess the precision of the results, we compare SfM‐MVS models spanning spatial scales of centimeters (a hand sample) to kilometers (the summit craters of Piton de la Fournaise volcano) with data acquired from laser scanning and formal close‐range photogrammetry. The relative precision ratio achieved by SfM‐MVS (measurement precision: observation distance) is limited by the straightforward camera calibration model used in the software, but generally exceeds 1:1000 (i.e., centimeter‐level precision over measurement distances of 10 s of meters). We apply SfM‐MVS at an intermediate scale, to determine erosion rates along a ∼50‐m‐long coastal cliff. Seven surveys carried out over a year indicate an average retreat rate of 0.70 ± 0.05 m a−1. Sequential erosion maps (at ∼0.05 m grid resolution) highlight the spatiotemporal variability in the retreat, with semivariogram analysis indicating a correlation between volume loss and length scale. Compared with a laser scanner survey of the same site, SfM‐MVS produced comparable data and reduced data collection time by ∼80%. Key Points Computer vision techniques can be used to derive DEMs from photographs Surface models of coastal cliffs permit geostatistical analysis of erosion Model precision ratios generally exceed 1:1000 thus are useful in geosciences
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-X9TKKQWM-5
istex:EAC351B8B89BD6FFA390DA420B2CA690C47ECBBE
ArticleID:2011JF002289
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-9003
2156-2202
2169-9011
DOI:10.1029/2011JF002289