Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Is Associated with a Higher Long-Term Recurrence Rate of Internal Hemorrhoids Compared with Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoid Surgery

PURPOSE: METHODS: RESULTS:Twelve trials were included. Follow-up varied from six months to four years. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy was more effective in preventing long-term recurrence of hemorrhoids (odds ratio (OR), 3.85; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 1.47-10.07; P < 0.006). Convention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiseases of the colon & rectum Vol. 50; no. 9; pp. 1297 - 1305
Main Authors Jayaraman, Shiva, Colquhoun, Patrick H. D, Malthaner, Richard A
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Secaucus, NJ The ASCRS 01.09.2007
Springer
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PURPOSE: METHODS: RESULTS:Twelve trials were included. Follow-up varied from six months to four years. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy was more effective in preventing long-term recurrence of hemorrhoids (odds ratio (OR), 3.85; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 1.47-10.07; P < 0.006). Conventional hemorrhoidectomy also prevents hemorrhoids in studies with follow-up of one year or more (OR, 3.6; 95 percent CI, 1.24-10.49; P < 0.02). Conventional hemorrhoidectomy is superior in preventing the symptom of prolapse (OR, 2.96; 95 percent CI, 1.33-6.58; P < 0.008). Conventional hemorrhoidectomy also is more effective at preventing prolapse in studies with follow-up of one year or more (OR, 2.68; 95 percent CI, 0.98-7.34; P < 0.05). Nonsignificant trends in favor of conventional hemorrhoidectomy were seen in the proportion of asymptomatic patients, bleeding, soiling/difficultly with hygiene/incontinence, the presence of perianal skin tags, and the need for further surgery. Nonsignificant trends in favor of stapled hemorrhoidopexy were seen in pain, pruritus ani, and symptoms of anal obstruction/stenosis. CONCLUSIONS:
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0012-3706
1530-0358
DOI:10.1007/s10350-007-0308-4