Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer

Background Virtual-reality (VR) simulator training has been shown to improve surgical performance in laparoscopic procedures in the operating room. We have, in a randomised controlled trial, demonstrated transferability to real operations. The validity of the LapSim virtual-reality simulator as an a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurgical endoscopy Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 722 - 727
Main Authors Maagaard, Mathilde, Sorensen, Jette Led, Oestergaard, Jeanett, Dalsgaard, Torur, Grantcharov, Teodor P., Ottesen, Bent S., Larsen, Christian Rifbjerg
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer-Verlag 01.03.2011
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Virtual-reality (VR) simulator training has been shown to improve surgical performance in laparoscopic procedures in the operating room. We have, in a randomised controlled trial, demonstrated transferability to real operations. The validity of the LapSim virtual-reality simulator as an assessment tool has been demonstrated in several reports. However, an unanswered question regarding simulator training is the durability, or retention, of skills acquired during simulator training. The aim of the present study is to assess the retention of skills acquired using the LapSim VR simulator, 6 and 18 months after an initial training course. Methods and materials The investigation was designed as a 6- and 18-month follow-up on a cohort of participants who earlier participated in a skills training programme on the LapSim VR. The follow-up cohort consisted of trainees and senior consultants allocated to two groups: (1) novices (experience < 5 procedures, n  = 9) and (2) experts (experience > 200 procedures during the past 3 years, n  = 10). Each participant performed ten sessions. Assessment of skills was based on time, economy of movement and the error parameter “bleeding”. The novice group were re-tested after 6 and 18 months, whereas the expert group were only retested once, after 6 months. None of the novices performed laparoscopic surgery in the follow-up period. The experts continued their daily work with laparoscopic surgery. Results and conclusions Novices showed retention of skills after 6 months. After 18 months, novices’ laparoscopic skills had returned to the pre-training level. This indicates that laparoscopic skills seemed to deteriorate in the period between 6 and 18 months without training. Experts showed consistent performance over time. This information can be included when planning training curricula in minimal invasive surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1233-5