Blood drawn through valved catheter hub connectors carries a significant risk of contamination

Infection Control became concerned when bloodstream infection (BSI) rates increased after implementing a needleless valved hub connector. During a 21-month period three different needleless catheter hub connectors were evaluated by quantitatively culturing blood drawn through hub connectors that wou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases Vol. 30; no. 12; pp. 1571 - 1577
Main Authors Sherertz, R. J., Karchmer, T. B., Palavecino, E., Bischoff, W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.12.2011
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Infection Control became concerned when bloodstream infection (BSI) rates increased after implementing a needleless valved hub connector. During a 21-month period three different needleless catheter hub connectors were evaluated by quantitatively culturing blood drawn through hub connectors that would have ordinarily been discarded (DBC). DBC drawn through Clearlink™ catheter hub connectors were found to be twice as likely to be positive as DBC drawn through Clave® or Q-syte™ hub connectors ( P  < 0.04). DBC grew pathogens 46% of the time and skin organisms 54% of the time. Patients with positive DBC were three times more likely to meet Centers for Disease Control (CDC) BSI criteria by DBC cultures than by physician-ordered blood cultures (CBC; P  < 0.001). For patients growing pathogens in DBC, 64% had no CBC drawn, the average temperature was lower than for patients with pathogens in CBC (99.3 ± 1.5 ve 100.6 ± 1.9, P  = 0.015), and 92% of discharged patients (11 out of 12) were not treated with an antibiotic active against the DBC pathogen. Drawing BC through a catheter hub connector carries a risk of false-positives that could increase BSI rates by up to 3-fold. Further work is necessary to evaluate this concern.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0934-9723
1435-4373
DOI:10.1007/s10096-011-1262-6