Research commentary on recommendations with side information: A survey and research directions

•A comprehensive systematic survey on recommendation systems with side information.•Two orthogonal perspectives on identified for classifying and concluding literature.•Sufficient discussions and analysis are given for guiding research on this topic.•Potential directions are given for future researc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inElectronic commerce research and applications Vol. 37; p. 100879
Main Authors Sun, Zhu, Guo, Qing, Yang, Jie, Fang, Hui, Guo, Guibing, Zhang, Jie, Burke, Robin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.09.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•A comprehensive systematic survey on recommendation systems with side information.•Two orthogonal perspectives on identified for classifying and concluding literature.•Sufficient discussions and analysis are given for guiding research on this topic.•Potential directions are given for future research. Recommender systems have become an essential tool to help resolve the information overload problem in recent decades. Traditional recommender systems, however, suffer from data sparsity and cold start problems. To address these issues, a great number of recommendation algorithms have been proposed to leverage side information of users or items (e.g., social network and item category), demonstrating a high degree of effectiveness in improving recommendation performance. This Research Commentary aims to provide a comprehensive and systematic survey of the recent research on recommender systems with side information. Specifically, we provide an overview of state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms with side information from two orthogonal perspectives. One involves the different methodologies of recommendation: the memory-based methods, latent factor, representation learning and deep learning models. The others cover different representations of side information, including structural data (flat, network, and hierarchical features, and knowledge graphs); and non-structural data (text, image and video features). Finally, we discuss challenges and provide new potential directions in recommendation, along with the conclusion of this survey.
ISSN:1567-4223
1873-7846
DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100879