P-glycoprotein Substrate Assessment in Drug Discovery: Application of Modeling to Bridge Differential Protein Expression Across In Vitro Tools
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux assay is an integral part of discovery screening, especially for drugs requiring brain penetration as P-gp efflux ratio (ER) inversely correlates with brain exposure. However, significant variability in P-gp ER generated across cell lines can lead to misclassification of...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of pharmaceutical sciences Vol. 110; no. 1; pp. 325 - 337 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.01.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux assay is an integral part of discovery screening, especially for drugs requiring brain penetration as P-gp efflux ratio (ER) inversely correlates with brain exposure. However, significant variability in P-gp ER generated across cell lines can lead to misclassification of a P-gp substrate and subsequently disconnect with brain exposure data. We hypothesized that the ER depends on P-gp protein expression level in the in vitro assay. Quantitative proteomics and immunofluorescence staining were utilized to characterize P-gp protein expression and localization in four recombinant cell lines, over-expressing human or mouse P-gp isoforms, followed by functional evaluation. Efflux data generated in each cell line was compared against available rodent brain distribution data. The results suggested that the cell line with highest P-gp expression (hMDCK-MDR1 sourced from NIH) led to greatest dynamic range for efflux; thus, proving to be the most sensitive model to predict brain penetration. Cell lines with lower P-gp expression exhibited the greatest tendency for compound-dependent in vitro efflux saturation leading to false negative results. Ultimately, P-gp kinetics were characterized using a compartmental model to generate system-independent parameters to resolve such discrepancy. This study highlights the need for careful choice of well characterized P-gp in vitro tools and utility of modeling techniques to enable appropriate interpretation of the data. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3549 1520-6017 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.017 |