Management and outcome of high-risk neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix in children; A systematic review
This study systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the value of secondary surgery for children with a high-risk neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of appendix. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case ser...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of surgical oncology Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 329 - 338 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the value of secondary surgery for children with a high-risk neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of appendix. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series reporting on the management and outcomes of patients (<20 years) with a histopathologically proven NET of the appendix were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently selected eligible articles, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. The outcomes of patients with a high-risk NET treated with secondary surgery were compared to those treated without secondary surgery. Primary outcomes were recurrence rate and disease-free survival. The literature search yielded 667 articles, of which 29 were included. These studies reported on 1112 patients, of whom 145 (13%) had high-risk NET. Heterogeneity between studies was large and risk of bias was serious in 26 and moderate in three studies. Secondary surgery after primary appendectomy was performed in 64 of 145 patients (44%). Length of follow-up ranged between 0 and 612 months. In both treatment groups no recurrences were reported, and thus disease-free survival was 100%. Based on current literature, the value of secondary surgery for pediatric high-risk NET of the appendix may be questioned. However, evidence is scarce, of low-quality, and heterogeneity between studies is large. Large international studies with adequate follow-up are needed to generate high-quality evidence on this topic. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Commentary-4 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 ObjectType-Undefined-5 |
ISSN: | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.021 |