The impact of MAS on perceived auditor independence-some evidence from Denmark

• Published in: Accounting forum Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 137 - 168
• Main Authors: Quick, Reiner, Warming-Rasmussen, Bent
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2005
• Subjects: Auditing; Company law; Danish subjects; Europe; Financial statements; Maximum relative consulting fee; Non-audit services; Perceived auditor independence; Danish subjects; Maximum relative consulting fee; Non-audit services; Perceived auditor independence
• ISSN: 0155-9982; 1467-6303
• DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.09.001

The Enron case has highlighted that the provision of management advisory services (MAS) can endanger auditor independence. Recently, a number of changes have not only been made to the relevant international and US regulations, but also to the Danish regulations in this area. Theoretical research explains the emergence of non-independence and demonstrates that the provision of MAS can decrease independence. According to the economic model of DeAngelo, the existence of client-specific quasi-rents impairs auditor independence. The provision of MAS increases quasi-rents and thus, is a threat to independence. Antle used an agency theoretical approach. Information asymmetries between auditor and client could lead to a moral hazard risk, i.e. the auditor could give up independence from client's management and accept payments for withholding detected errors and irregularities. The client's management could also use MAS to legally compensate the auditor for giving away independence. A large number of empirical studies have investigated the influence of MAS on the perceived independence of the auditor. Most of these studies were performed in English speaking countries and the majority found a negative impact. Sociological research reveals cultural differences between English speaking and Nordic countries, e.g. concerning the dimension ‘masculinity’. Thus, an empirical investigation of the impact of MAS on perceived auditor independence in Denmark is promising. It was found that shareholders, bank loan officers and journalists perceive a negative effect on auditor independence if MAS are provided. The recent liberalization in Denmark is inconsistent with this finding. Furthermore, it was shown that the type of MAS influences the degree to which auditor independence is perceived to be impaired. Thus, independence rules related to MAS should be differentiated. Additionally, the study ascertained that perceived auditor independence does not increase if MAS are provided by a separate department of the audit firm. An internal separation of the auditing and the consulting function within the same audit firm is not viewed as being beneficial in Denmark.